找回密码
 注册
楼主: chenzhen0919

安全帽帽带问题 (国内外差异)

  [复制链接]
发表于 2012-2-8 16:03 | 显示全部楼层
以前做安全没有注意到这点    但在施工中因此发生问题  就更该要求必须带了
发表于 2012-2-9 08:40 | 显示全部楼层
我们公司原来也一直在这个问题上纠结,就此事,我还与我们公司的总经理、美国的高级工程师以及我们的厂长( ...
安全-管理 发表于 2011-8-31 15:51



    绝对给力!
发表于 2012-2-9 11:28 | 显示全部楼层
帽带还是系好为好
发表于 2012-2-9 18:01 | 显示全部楼层
要求要带,但是实际情况,保证每一个人都带,难啊
发表于 2012-2-11 13:43 | 显示全部楼层
我们的管理更具人性化
发表于 2012-2-12 11:43 | 显示全部楼层
要系带。
发表于 2012-2-12 20:55 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵,看到你们的发言我好失望
首先我来说一下国内为什么是严格要求一定带帽带,这里面其实有我们管理思路模式和思路的问题,我们的领导(尤其是重要领导)想到了一件事情,如果是既简单又能突出改变的,往往就会得到大力推行,不遗余力,如果困难并不能立刻见到成效的,往往就无人问津了,帽带这个事就是这样,我们办事就是一阵风,刮起来时天昏地暗,帽带就是这样。想想我们的领导视察工作,那个不是搞一个长长的车队,前呼后拥的?国外的高层一般轻车简从,来了就看问题,解决问题,这就是体制不一样,思路不一样。看管以为然否?
发表于 2012-2-13 22:13 | 显示全部楼层
学习了,
发表于 2012-2-13 22:56 | 显示全部楼层
学习...
发表于 2012-2-16 09:32 | 显示全部楼层
I just care Why the foreign didn't tie up?  Do they think that safe? Why
发表于 2012-2-16 09:33 | 显示全部楼层
回复 7# eric_lam


    May be right
发表于 2012-2-17 23:45 | 显示全部楼层
标准化的要求 还是要带滴
发表于 2012-2-18 08:34 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 chyjames 于 2012-2-18 09:15 编辑

New ANSI Standard for Industrial Head Protection(http://ehstoday.com/ppe/eye-face-head/ehs_imp_36787/)

Jan 8, 2004 12:00 AM, By Sandy Smith

For the first time, a U.S. standard includes specifications for industrial helmets designed to offer protection from a lateral impact.



The standard, ANSI Z87.1-1997 retains the performance requirements for helmets offering top impact protection. This gives employers and users the flexibility to specify the helmet that best meets the needs of their specific workplace.

ANSI Z87.1-1997 was prepared by the members of the International Safety Equipment Association's (ISEA) Head Protection Group as a substantial revision to ANSI Z89.1-1986, and approved following input from users, government agencies and safety experts. It contains new classifications of protective helmets for the first time since the 1981 revision.

Industrial head protective helmets meeting the requirements of this standard are classified by both type and class differently than in the past. The old designations Type 1 (hats) and Type 2 (caps) are no longer used. Performance requirements for the new Type I helmet are equivalent to those specified in the 1986 revision. Thus, any helmets meeting the requirements of ANSI Z89.1-1986 should meet the requirements for Type I in this revision.

Type II helmet performance requirements include criteria for:


Impact energy attenuation from impacts from the front, back and sides as well as the top
Off-center penetration resistance
Chin strap retention
The Class A, B and C electrical insulation classifications have been replaced by new designations: Class G (general), Class E (electrical) and Class C (conductive no electrical protection).

Copies of the standard are available from ISEA by calling (703) 525-1695. The single-copy cost is $30, or $25 for ISEA member companies.

从ANSI的标准来看,安全埋的冒带是一项最基本的要求应予以遵循。
发表于 2012-2-28 12:29 | 显示全部楼层
没错,戴比不戴要好!
发表于 2012-2-28 12:32 | 显示全部楼层
这是必须的,没有可商量的余地
发表于 2012-2-29 08:48 | 显示全部楼层
关注中,曾经为了提醒让老外戴上帽带,差点和老外打起来,工作方法有问题:(
发表于 2012-2-29 14:14 | 显示全部楼层
看看,学习借鉴
发表于 2012-3-1 22:00 | 显示全部楼层
应该要带
发表于 2012-3-2 07:06 | 显示全部楼层

标题

回复 29# stratovarius
    主要考虑是否存高空坠物和高处坠落的风险和可能,不是所有地方都需要的啊。
发表于 2012-3-3 21:40 | 显示全部楼层
可能是教育和安全意识又区别。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

网站业务合作!

QQ|安全论坛 ( 晋ICP备2023016270号-1 )

GMT+8, 2025-7-12 19:34

Powered by anquan.com.cn X3.9 Licensed

© 2003-2023 Azh Ltd.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表